翻訳と辞書 Words near each other ・ United States v. Montoya De Hernandez ・ United States v. Moore ・ United States v. More ・ United States v. Moreland ・ United States v. Morgan ・ United States v. Morlang ・ United States v. Morris ・ United States v. Morris (1991) ・ United States v. Morrison ・ United States v. Mueller ・ United States v. Munoz-Flores ・ United States v. National Treasury Employees Union ・ United States v. Navajo Nation ・ United States v. Navajo Nation (2009) ・ United States v. Nice ・ United States v. Ninety-Five Barrels Alleged Apple Cider Vinegar ・ United States v. Nixon ・ United States v. Nosal ・ United States v. O'Brien ・ United States v. O'Hagan ・ United States v. O'Hara ・ United States v. Oakland Cannabis Buyers' Cooperative ・ United States v. Olano ・ United States v. Olofson ・ United States v. One Book Called Ulysses ・ United States v. One Package of Japanese Pessaries ・ United States v. Oppenheimer ・ United States v. Oregon ・ United States v. Ortiz ・ United States v. Pace Dictionary Lists mini英和辞書 mini和英辞書 Webster 1913 Latin-English FOLDOC Wikipedia English ウィキペディア

翻訳と辞書　辞書検索 [ 開発暫定版 ] スポンサード リンク United States v. Ninety-Five Barrels Alleged Apple Cider Vinegar ： ウィキペディア英語版 United States v. Ninety-Five Barrels Alleged Apple Cider Vinegar ''United States v. Ninety-Five Barrels Alleged Apple Cider Vinegar'', 265 U.S. 438 (1924),〔(265 U.S. 438 ) Full text of the opinion courtesy of Findlaw.com.〕 was an ''in rem'' case in which the Supreme Court of the United States held that apple cider vinegar is mislabeled when that vinegar is made from dried apples. The label at issue indicated that the vinegar was made from "selected" apples. Douglas Packing Company, the manufacturer, admitted to dehydrating fresh apples and then re-hydrating the apples with pure water to produce vinegar. Additional chemicals were used in the manufacturing process for vinegar made from dried apples, but neither party alleged that this affected the vinegar. Other than this and the difference in apples, the manufacturing process was the same. The trial judge, who tried samples of the vinegar at issue and apple cider vinegar made from fresh apples, concluded that there were only slight differences in appearance and taste. Chemical comparison yielded similar results for both liquids. There was no claim that vinegar from dried apples was of inferior quality. However, the court found first that the dried apple vinegar was not identical to vinegar as commonly understood—that produced from fresh ingredients. Second, fresh apples contain the apple juice that is normally used in the production of apple cider vinegar, whereas Douglas Packing used water as a substitute ingredient. Finally, the court found that "made from selected apples" misled the reader into thinking that the apples were fresh instead of dried. These three issues—an imitation under the same name, false or misleading ingredient listing, and misleading labelling—were all a part of the Pure Food and Drug Act section defining "misbranded". For this reason, the Supreme Court found that the apple cider was misbranded under the statute. == See also == *List of United States Supreme Court cases, volume 265 抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア（Wikipedia）』 ■ウィキペディアで「United States v. Ninety-Five Barrels Alleged Apple Cider Vinegar」の詳細全文を読む スポンサード リンク 翻訳と辞書 : 翻訳のためのインターネットリソース Copyright(C) kotoba.ne.jp 1997-2016. All Rights Reserved.